AI Visibility Audit
This report is confidential. Enter the access code provided by Saigon Digital to continue.
Incorrect code. Please try again.
Prepared by saigon.digital · July 2026
This report is confidential. Enter the access code provided by Saigon Digital to continue.
Your customers are no longer just searching on Google — they're asking AI which companies to shortlist. This audit shows exactly where you stand, who's winning, and what to do next.
Saigon Digital helped us completely rethink our digital visibility strategy. Within months of working together, our school started appearing in AI-generated recommendations, our organic traffic grew significantly, and the quality of admissions enquiries improved dramatically. They understand where digital discovery is heading and how to position brands to win.
See how we've helped brands grow. Read our case studies and learn more about what we do.
View Case StudiesA snapshot of where Wirehouse Employer Services stands in the AI search era — and the opportunity cost of the current gap.
When a UK employer asks AI who to trust for employment law, HR or health & safety support, the answers name Citation, Peninsula, Croner, WorkNest and Avensure. Wirehouse earns a Google AI Overview appearance for health & safety, proof it can win this game, but it is invisible for employment law and HR queries and absent from ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini entirely. Three of your four buyer journeys currently start with a competitor’s name.
We tested how Wirehouse Employer Services appears when potential customers ask AI tools to recommend HR, Employment Law & Health and Safety Consultancy providers in Warrington & Glasgow, UK. Here's what we found.
Recommendation patterns for UK employment-law queries name Peninsula, Citation and WorkNest. Wirehouse is absent.
Appearing for health & safety queries (verified live in the UK); absent for employment law, HR and comparison queries.
No citation-worthy structured content or corroborating sources for Perplexity to pull from.
No schema, no llms.txt and thin review footprint leave Gemini nothing to recommend.
1 / 4 platforms currently surface Wirehouse Employer Services in relevant AI-generated recommendations.
Structured authority content, third-party mentions, FAQ pages, and consistent brand signals across the web — all of which competitors currently have more of.
We ran the exact searches your buyers use when asking AI tools to recommend a solution. Here's who appeared — and whether Wirehouse Employer Services was in the answer.
How these were tested: every query reflects a real UK buyer search, tested in July 2026. Queries labelled “Google AI search results” were assessed through Google’s AI-powered results and the sources those answers cite (UK provider roundups, review platforms and directories). The health & safety query was additionally verified live in Google’s UK AI Overview, where Wirehouse appears. AI Overviews are personalised and location-dependent, so what an individual buyer sees can vary by region, device and history. This is why an engagement begins with a verbatim, screenshotted baseline of every priority query across all four AI platforms.
Google already trusts Wirehouse’s health & safety content enough to surface it in an AI Overview, which proves the model works. The brands that win every answer pair question-shaped advice content (free guides, “Peninsula alternative” comparison pages, cost explainers) with heavy third-party corroboration across review platforms, listicles and directories, and they win on all four platforms and every service line. Wirehouse’s employment law and HR content, and its off-site proof, are not yet at that standard. With no schema behind it, the current AI Overview slot is also fragile.
None of the mid-market players clearly own “fixed-fee, no long lock-in” positioning inside AI answers. It is the exact complaint buyers raise about Peninsula-style contracts in forums. Wirehouse’s genuine differentiators (24/7 advice line, flexible contracts, 40+ years founder pedigree) are precisely the attributes an AI will repeat once they are stated, structured and corroborated.
These are the companies currently winning AI recommendations in your market. Understanding why they're cited — and you're not — reveals the exact gap to close.
| Company | DR | ChatGPT | Google AIO | Perplexity | Why They Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wirehouse Employer Services You | 37 | Not Cited | Partial | Not Cited | Audit target |
| WorkNest | 66 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | Deep employment-law content hub + constant third-party citations in “best of” roundups. |
| Citation | 65 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | 140+ experts publishing at scale; appears in nearly every comparison list AI engines learn from. |
| Peninsula | 64 | Cited | Appearing | Cited | Category-defining brand with a huge free-advice library that AI quotes verbatim. |
| Croner | 61 | Cited | Appearing | Partial | Award-badged resource hub and structured service pages built for answer engines. |
| Avensure | 56 | Partial | Appearing | Partial | Owns “fixed monthly fee” positioning and invests in review-platform volume. |
Badge key: Cited Partial Not Cited
These are the highest-leverage changes Wirehouse Employer Services can make right now to start appearing in AI-generated recommendations within 30–90 days.
Add Organization, Service, FAQ and Breadcrumb schema across the site plus an llms.txt file. The site runs on Gatsby, so these are clean, low-risk deploys, and right now the count is zero, so every addition is pure upside.
Restructure the top advice pages into the exact questions buyers ask AI (“Peninsula alternative without long contracts”, “what does outsourced H&S cost”) and publish comparison pages competitors already win with.
Wirehouse has 2 Trustpilot reviews; Peninsula and Citation have thousands of review signals AI leans on. A systematic review-request programme plus placement in the directories and roundups AI cites moves the trust needle fast.
While auditing how AI sees Wirehouse Employer Services, we also looked at the website itself (Gatsby (static React)). These specific issues are holding back both your AI visibility and how the site converts, and they are all fixable.
The homepage (wirehouse-es.com) exposes zero JSON-LD — no Organization, LocalBusiness, Service or FAQ schema. For a multi-service consultancy this is the single biggest technical reason AI engines and Google cannot confidently describe or recommend the business.
wirehouse-es.com/llms.txt returns 404 and robots.txt gives AI crawlers no curated entry point. Competitors are actively shipping AI-readiness files; Wirehouse’s content is left for engines to guess at.
“Request a Callback” hands prospects to an external Zoho form domain and the client portal lives on a separate unbranded domain (guardian-es.com), splitting brand equity, breaking analytics attribution and adding friction at the exact moment of highest intent.
Web development and WordPress are core strengths at Saigon Digital. Fixing the issues above is part of the work, not a separate project. We handle the AI visibility, the SEO, and the website itself.
This audit shows the problem. Fixing it usually means more than AI alone: the website, the SEO and the AI visibility all work together. We handle all three, then keep it growing.
Wirehouse Employer Services has a clear path to winning AI and search visibility, and a website that supports it. The gap to competitors is real but closeable. We typically start with a fixed-price foundation sprint (AI and GEO, SEO, and the website fixes above), then a simple monthly retainer to keep growing and maintain the site. A 30-minute call is all it takes to map it out.
Nick Rowe · CEO & Co-Founder, Saigon Digital
A fixed-price 3-month sprint: get cited in AI answers, fix the SEO foundations, and reposition and repair the website (development and WordPress included). One scope, one price.
A simple monthly retainer once the foundation is set: continued SEO and AI visibility growth, content, and website maintenance and support. Rolling monthly, no long lock-in.
Every month your competitors build more authority signals, the gap widens. AI models are training on content published now, so delay compounds the problem.